![]() Those PCIe 4 numbers are also a huge improvement over the older S70, whose actual performance compared to the latest generation of transport technology didn’t quite match its showy synthetic benchmark results. ![]() ![]() Nothing beats the FireCuda 530 when it comes to reading and writing in the real world, but the S70 Blade has done pretty well. ![]() Well behind the FireCuda 530, but only in the shadow of the 980 Pro IDG In the 48GB transfer tests shown below, the Adata S70 blade ranks third. The S70 blade actually outperformed the otherwise top dog FireCuda 530 in the CDM 6 sequential read test. Note that Adata has released a post-test firmware update that promises an increase in performance. It held up well in a number of other tests and beat or run neck and neck with the excellent 980 Samsung Pro in a number of other tests. While that may not quite match the mighty (and very expensive) Seagate FireCuda 530 overall the Adata S70 blade managed to outperform it in the CrystalDiskMark 6 write test. NeedleĪdata’s S70 blade opts for a slim heat sink and 176-layer NAND rather than the massive heatsink and 96-layer NAND used by the older S70.Īs you can guess from that last paragraph, the drive comes in two capacities: 1TB (currently about $ 150 on Amazon), and the 2 TB version (currently around $ 300 on Amazon) Both have a five-year warranty and are rated at 740 TBW (terabytes that can be written) and 1480 TBW respectively. ![]() As the reader fills up, these amounts decrease. There is still 1 GB of DRAM cache per terabyte of NAND, and about a third of the NAND can be treated as SLC for secondary caching purposes: 333 GB for the 1 TB version and 666 GB for the 2 TB version that I tested. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |